Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Performing the TestimonialRethinking Verbatim Dramaturgies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amanda Stuart Fisher

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9781526145741

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: May 2021

DOI: 10.7765/9781526145758

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 26 July 2021

Testimony as speaking out: performing the ethico-political imperatives of witnessing

Testimony as speaking out: performing the ethico-political imperatives of witnessing

Chapter:
(p.143) 4 Testimony as speaking out: performing the ethico-political imperatives of witnessing
Source:
Performing the Testimonial
Author(s):

Amanda Stuart Fisher

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7765/9781526145758.00011

This chapter considers the proposal that testimonial performance has the political potential to stage what Foucault has described as parrhesia, a mode of speaking truth to power. In testimonial theatre, the witness as parrhesiastes speaks out about real events of injustice and in so doing illuminates perspectives that have been overlooked or erased by dominant political discourses. Drawing on a discussion of The Colour of Justice (Norton-Taylor, 1999), The Hounding of David Oluwale (Agboluaje, 2009) and Notes from the Field (Smith, 2019), three plays about police racism and racialised social injustice, the chapter argues that the dramaturgical form of the tribunal play does not necessarily offer the most political or ethical engagement with acts of parrhesia. Rather it is through testimonial dramaturgical approaches that the parrhesiastes can be repositioned as narrators of their own story and able to speak out in their own words about the injustice endured. The chapter concludes with some proposals that address what is articulated as the ‘ethical demand of testimonial practice’ – a premise developed by drawing on the philosophy of Simon Critchley and Knud Ejler Løgstrup’s theorisation of the ethical demand.

Keywords:   ethical demand, Knud Ejler Løgstrup, parrhesia, politics, racism, Simon Critchley, social injustice, testimonial practice, tribunal theatre

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.