Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The power of pragmatismKnowledge production and social inquiry$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jane Wills and Robert Lake

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9781526134943

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: January 2021

DOI: 10.7765/9781526134950

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 05 August 2021

Truth and academia in times of fake news, alternative facts and filter bubbles: A pragmatist notion of critique as mediation

Truth and academia in times of fake news, alternative facts and filter bubbles: A pragmatist notion of critique as mediation

Chapter:
(p.139) 7 Truth and academia in times of fake news, alternative facts and filter bubbles: A pragmatist notion of critique as mediation
Source:
The power of pragmatism
Author(s):

Klaus Geiselhart

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7765/9781526134950.00015

While scientists protest publicly against right-wing populists bending truths, humanists and social scientists are remarkably quiet. This is not surprising since constructivist relativism and poststructuralist ideas about the politics of knowledge have been widely adopted. This chapter explores the ideological conundrum facing social scientists and argues that pragmatism can provide resources for finding a way forward. By formulating specific criteria by means of which theories and truths can be compared and evaluated, pragmatist epistemology positions the academic as a social advisor or mediator. Moreover, on the basis of pragmatic democratic theory, it can be argued that politics is not only agonistic but needs a conciliatory moment to function sustainably. In this spirit, academic criticism should be understood not only as opposition but also as mediation. Rather than just opposing dominant thinking, the academic can engage in a cooperative vein, contributing to the decisions that are taken by mediating between different positions and points of view.

Keywords:   post-factual, right-wing populism, pragmatism, democracy, mediation, critique, criticism

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.