Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
An archaeology of innovationApproaching social and technological change in human society$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Catherine J. Frieman

Print publication date: 2021

Print ISBN-13: 9781526132642

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2021

DOI: 10.7765/9781526132659

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 22 May 2022

Tradition, continuity, and resistance

Tradition, continuity, and resistance

Chapter:
(p.129) 6 Tradition, continuity, and resistance
Source:
An archaeology of innovation
Author(s):

Catherine J. Frieman

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7765/9781526132659.00013

This chapter explores the tricky question of non-innovation, and how we might understand it both archaeologically and in the present. At its core is the case study of Romano-British Cornwall, during an apparently static and stodgy period where archaeologists have observed a marked tendency towards continuity from much earlier periods in settlement pattern and material culture. By assuming that this seeming non-change reflected active, negotiated choices, a new model emerges in which maintaining traditional practices and ways of life is part of an active resistance of Roman domination. This case study is used as an entry point, first to discuss how to identify and understand innovation resistance or non-innovation in archaeological contexts and, second, to understand the various practices that are bundled together under the umbrella of conservatism. The chapter emphasizes how innovation and non-innovation result from and affect flows of power, and the effects of these on personal and social networks. The logic of anti-innovation is explored, and the modern myth of disruption as unalloyed good is, itself, disrupted. The chapter builds on post-colonial literature to argue that persistence is a better frame for non-innovation than conservatism, but that even the identification of a given practice as innovative or not is a subjective judgment affected by power relations, histories of practice, and local context.

Keywords:   conservatism, tradition, resistance, continuity, persistence, Romano-Britain, prehistoric Cornwall, post-colonial approaches, disruption, creative destruction

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.