Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mixed MessagesAmerican Correspondences in Visual and Verbal Practices$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Catherine Gander and Sarah Garland

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781784991500

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9781784991500.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 26 September 2021

‘Being kept in the dark can be a critical gesture’: Arakawa and Madeline Gins’s Mechanism of Meaning

‘Being kept in the dark can be a critical gesture’: Arakawa and Madeline Gins’s Mechanism of Meaning

Chapter:
(p.108) 6 ‘Being kept in the dark can be a critical gesture’: Arakawa and Madeline Gins’s Mechanism of Meaning
Source:
Mixed Messages
Author(s):

Sarah Garland

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9781784991500.003.0007

The Mechanism of Meaning (1963-1973; 1996) by artist-architect-poet-philosophers Arakawa and Madeline Gins, unfolds over more than eighty eight-foot high painted and collaged panels, using image, object and text together to produce an epic diagram of the mind as it works at problem solving and meaning making. At the core of this project is a mobilisation of impossibility, ambiguity, mistakes, frustrations, puns and illogicality that, in asking for a solution or movement and then denying it, self-reflexively sends the viewer-reader back to their own actions as meaning-making mechanisms in the manner of Zen koans and Dada jokes. Arakawa and Gins, working in a neo-Duchampian tradition, use ‘non-retinal’ resources to reconfigure perception and reason by problematising the visual and textual world through embedding it within a set of playfully illogical conceptual constructs, acting to bring back to perception those other, non-visual senses, whilst embedding them in a consideration of bodily experience brought forth by sightlessness and physical frustration. The Mechanism of Meaning uses its combination of visual, haptic and verbal to move between visible and invisible form, Garland argues, to provoke the viewer-reader into considering the active roles of the mind and of the other non-visual senses in reading, seeing and reasoning.

Keywords:   Arakawa and Gins, Mechanism of Meaning, Conceptual art, Marcel Duchamp, Blindness, Embodied Cognition

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.