Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hong Kong and British Culture, 1945-97$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark Hampton

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780719099236

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719099236.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 23 May 2022

The discourse of unbridled capitalism in postwar Hong Kong

The discourse of unbridled capitalism in postwar Hong Kong

Chapter:
(p.42) Chapter Two The discourse of unbridled capitalism in postwar Hong Kong
Source:
Hong Kong and British Culture, 1945-97
Author(s):

Mark Hampton

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719099236.003.0002

During the post-war period, as a broad consensus was thought to have formed in the UK around the welfare state, Hong Kong was widely heralded as an arena in which pre-1945 British capitalist and entrepreneurial ideals continued to flourish. To its defenders, Hong Kong’s laissez-faire practices, or “positive non-interventionism”, made Hong Kong more British than Britain itself. Detractors of colonial Hong Kong, who emphasized sweatshops and squatter huts, confirmed the sharp difference between metropolitan and colonial practice. To Hong Kong’s champions, whose views were broadly hegemonic, Britain’s “benign neglect” was largely responsible for Hong Kong’s transformation from a “barren rock” into one of the world’s great cities. Not only did such views appear in political debates and journalistic accounts, but they also came out in fictional accounts, above all in the novels of James Clavell. At the same time, Hong Kong’s advocates insisted that greater regulation was not only self-defeating but futile; according to prevailing discourse, Chinese people “liked to overwork”. During the 1960s and 1970s, critics of Britain’s welfare state consensus, including Sir Keith Joseph, often used Hong Kong as a foil for critiquing Britain’s own supposed failed economic policies and economic decline.

Keywords:   Welfare state, Laissez-faire, Positive non-interventionism, James Clavell, Sir Keith Joseph, Sweatshops

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.