Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Tolerance and Diversity In Ireland, North and South$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Iseult Honohan and Nathalie Rougier

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780719097201

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719097201.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 26 September 2021

Two wrongs don’t make a right: (in)tolerance and hate crime laws in Northern Ireland

Two wrongs don’t make a right: (in)tolerance and hate crime laws in Northern Ireland

Chapter:
(p.171) 9 Two wrongs don’t make a right: (in)tolerance and hate crime laws in Northern Ireland
Source:
Tolerance and Diversity In Ireland, North and South
Author(s):

Chris Gilligan

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719097201.003.0010

The issue of racism and sectarianism is increasingly understood through the prism of ‘hate crime’. This way of conceptualising racism and sectarianism is usually accompanied by the claim that society should be intolerant towards intolerance. This chapter argues that this involves a particular interpretation of tolerance and intolerance – one which deviates significantly from the traditional liberal conception of toleration. The chapter outlines public attitudes towards additional penalties for racial aggravation in race hate crimes. It then explores the rationales for these views by the public and points out that the main principle which is articulated by the majority of those who oppose hate crime laws, and a significant proportion who support the law, is one of equality in the eyes of the law. The chapter then judges hate crime laws against John Stuart Mill's defence of tolerance, argue that they are antithetical to Mill's defence of tolerance. It concludes by arguing, firstly, that hate crime laws undermine the principle of equality – which has been, and continues to be, fundamental to anti-racism. And secondly, that they undermine tolerance, which is fundamental to personal liberty.

Keywords:   Racism, Sectarianism, Hate crime, Intolerance, Equality, Northern Ireland

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.