Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Historical epistemology and the making of modern Chinese medicine$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Howard Chiang

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780719096006

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719096006.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use.date: 28 September 2021

State power, governmentality, and the (mis)remembrance of Chinese medicine

State power, governmentality, and the (mis)remembrance of Chinese medicine

Chapter:
(p.160) 6 State power, governmentality, and the (mis)remembrance of Chinese medicine
Source:
Historical epistemology and the making of modern Chinese medicine
Author(s):

David Luesink

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719096006.003.0006

In China, between 1916 and 1930, two projects mixed power, language and epistemology: the attempt to unify the terminology for medicine; and the attempt to regulate and abolish Chinese medicine. The annual meetings of the Joint Committee for medical and scientific terminology during these years became a staging point for practitioners of “western medicine” in their attempts to retrain and ultimately obliterate practitioners of an older form of medicine which abolitionists decried as “insane.” This paper follows the abolition attempts of Yu Yunxiu, who infamously attempted to eliminate Chinese medicine in the late 1920s, and those of a lesser known predecessor, Tang Erhe, a founding member of the Joint Terminology Committee. I argue that it is no coincidence that participation in the mundane work of standardizing terminology occurred simultaneously with, or just prior to, Tang and Yu’s most determined attempts to use their considerable influence within the state to regulate practitioners of Chinese medicine. The logic of governmentality led men like Tang and Yu to eliminate ambiguity in the medical field by establishing a clear standard for medical education, based on anatomical interventions and a standardized terminology. Chinese medicine survived the struggle, but in the process itself became entrenched in a system of self-governmentalization.

Keywords:   Governmentality, Terminology, Standardization, Yu Yunxiu, Tang Erhe, National Medical Journal

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.