Adulterous cohabitees experienced great ambivalence in their family lives and at law. Couples justified cohabitation on causes that mirrored the list of suggested divorce reforms in the late nineteenth century. Discretion was the key to a successful ménage à trois. Most cohabitees tried to find ways to marry before settling for cohabitation. Men's families might be more sympathetic than women's, since men had more sexual freedom. The cohabiting family was the most likely to face hardships, as they had few legal rights. Social ostracism was only one possible negative response to adulterous unions. The legal problems of adulterous unions are explored. Middle-class adulterous cohabitation showed both the possibilities and limitations to marital rebellion. Adulterous unions were not illegal, but the participants still faced intervention from the state. Adulterous cohabitees experienced family opposition; moreover, women suffered more than men in both groups.
Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.