Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Islamic Charities and Islamic Humanism in Troubled Times$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jonathan Benthall

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781784993085

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9781784993085.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 October 2018

Confessional cousins and the rest: the structure of Islamic toleration

Confessional cousins and the rest: the structure of Islamic toleration

Chapter:
(p.137) 10 Confessional cousins and the rest: the structure of Islamic toleration
Source:
Islamic Charities and Islamic Humanism in Troubled Times
Author(s):

Jonathan Benthall

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9781784993085.003.0011

Adducing some insights from cultural anthropology, this Chapter compares and contrasts the histories of the Christian and the Islamic traditions of religious toleration, considering in particular the blurring of the distinction between “People of the Book” and “pagans” or “polytheists”. It argues that each tradition has strengths and weaknesses if we consider them as contributions to a humanism acceptable to people today who subscribe to various religious beliefs or to none. Christendom was guilty historically of worse religious intolerance than Islam, yet it also engendered a humanistic respect for “primitive” belief systems. Islam institutionalized the concept of People of the Book, which gave a qualified recognition to its “confessional cousins”, but it excluded “pagan” cultures unless they agreed to convert. Yet Islam was also capable of flexibility when a small Muslim court in India ruled over a vast non-Muslim population. An extended prefatory note reviews the progress of scholarship since the first publication of this text in Anthropology Today in 2005, and asks whether it is necessary to modify the suggestion that Muslim social scientists are inhibited from choosing to study non-monotheistic cultures. The conclusion reached ten years later is that there are at least some major exceptions.

Keywords:   Cultural anthropology, Christianity, Islam, Tolerance, Pagans, Polytheists, People of the book

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.