Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Islamic Charities and Islamic Humanism in Troubled Times$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jonathan Benthall

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781784993085

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9781784993085.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 September 2018

An unholy tangle: Boim versus the Holy Land Foundation

An unholy tangle: Boim versus the Holy Land Foundation

Chapter:
(p.99) 6 An unholy tangle: Boim versus the Holy Land Foundation
Source:
Islamic Charities and Islamic Humanism in Troubled Times
Author(s):

Jonathan Benthall

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9781784993085.003.0007

This chapter, originally published in a law journal (the UCLA Journal of Near Eastern and Islamic Law), follows up the issue of the Palestinian zakat committees which was discussed in Chapter 5. It describes a civil action launched in the US courts by the family of David Boim, a boy of seventeen, who was killed by Palestinians in a drive-by shooting in the West Bank in 1996. The family, being unable to sue either two alleged murderers or Hamas (as the presumed instigator of the attacks) sued the Holy Land Foundation on the grounds that it had remitted funds to zakat committees, held to be façades for Hamas. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found in favour of the Boims, by a majority. The majority decision was written by Judge Richard Posner. The controversial principles in US law of “material support for terrorism” and “fungibility” (i.e. transferability) of assets are discussed here. It is argued that the Court did not give enough attention to making clear its commitment to fairness, while the minority opinion was unimpeachable.

Keywords:   Palestine, West Bank, Zakat committees, Boim v. Holy Land Foundation, Posner, Judge Richard, Material support for terrorism, Fungibility of assets, Hamas, UCLA Journal of Near Eastern and Islamic Law

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.