Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Alternative countrysidesAnthropological approaches to rural Western Europe today$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeremy MacClancy

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780719096846

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719096846.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see http://www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 01 May 2017

A ‘private place’? Changing meanings of the countryside in northern Italy

A ‘private place’? Changing meanings of the countryside in northern Italy

Chapter:
(p.29) 2 A ‘private place’? Changing meanings of the countryside in northern Italy
Source:
Alternative countrysides
Author(s):

Jaro Stacul

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719096846.003.0002

Jaro Stacul investigates the consequences of an Italian party’s discourse about the countryside, and how it has dovetailed with local concerns. He discusses the rise of the Lega Nord (Northern League) in the 1990s, a time of national disenchantment with established parties, then widely seen as deeply corrupt. Leaders of the populist Lega called for the recreation of a lost ‘authenticity’ and a traditional sense of community, propagating an idea of a northern Italian culture, denigrating southerners as lazy and parasitic, and criticizing the state as the distant imposer of an alienating ‘civilization’. To these rhetoricians, it was the northern countryside which was the repository of laudatory values, in particular an ethic of hard work. To the Trentino villagers, with whom he did fieldwork and whose area had not been incorporated into Italy until the end of the First World War, the Lega was attractive because they regarded the state as remote, if not indeed foreign, and as responsible for creating a National Park in their area. The state saw the park as a wild, public space; locals saw it as a restrictive practice which curtailed the exercise of their traditional practices, such as hunting, which they had carried out on land they regarded as cultivated, in effect private property.

Keywords:   political rural discourse, National Park policy, Vanoi, Trentino

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.