Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Children’s rights, Eastern enlargement and the EU human rights regime$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ingi Iusmen

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780719088223

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719088223.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see http://www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 April 2018

Drivers of change, policy entrepreneurship and the institutionalization of children’s rights

Drivers of change, policy entrepreneurship and the institutionalization of children’s rights

Chapter:
(p.122) 5 Drivers of change, policy entrepreneurship and the institutionalization of children’s rights
Source:
Children’s rights, Eastern enlargement and the EU human rights regime
Author(s):

Ingi Iusmen

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719088223.003.0006

This chapter provides insights into the analytical frameworks explaining the feedback effects triggered by the EU intervention in child rights in Romania, and the institutionalisation of this policy area at the EU level. Kingdon’s (1984) model of multiple streams coupling accounts for agenda-setting processes, via policy entrepreneurship, which led to the emergence of an EU child rights policy as part of EU internal policy. It is argued, therefore, that policy feedback occurred due to the opening of a window of opportunity which allowed EU entrepreneurs to push certain human rights issues, such as children’s rights, high up on the EU’s policy agenda. In line with the Europeanization scholarship, it is claimed that the EU has started to import its own EU-topia, which was initially intended only for external consumption. Historical institutionalist elements, such as path-dependency, lock-ins, institutional development and self-reinforcing institutions, are employed to explain the feedback effects on the EU enlargement policy. Path-dependency and lock-ins illustrate how and why the protection of the rights of the child is now an entrenched EU accession condition, which was initially developed in relation to Romania’s accession agenda.

Keywords:   Agenda-setting, policy entrepreneurs, window of opportunity, EU-topianization

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.