Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Witchcraft Narratives in GermanyRothenburg, 1561-1652$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Alison Rowlands

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780719052590

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: July 2012

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719052590.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see http://www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 November 2017

‘An honourable man should not talk about that which he cannot prove’: slander and speech about witchcraft

‘An honourable man should not talk about that which he cannot prove’: slander and speech about witchcraft

Chapter:
(p.14) 1 ‘An honourable man should not talk about that which he cannot prove’: slander and speech about witchcraft
Source:
Witchcraft Narratives in Germany
Author(s):

Alison Rowlands

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719052590.003.0002

This chapter explores popular speech about witchcraft, explains why the inhabitants of Rothenburg and its hinterland were generally unwilling to accuse suspected witches at law, and details the non-legal methods with which they more usually coped with witches. The Wettringen case from 1561 is used as a starting point to focus on two legal factors central to this web of restraints: the unwillingness of the Rothenburg council to abandon due legal procedure in its treatment of witchcraft, and the role that the legal treatment of slander in Rothenburg played in dissuading people from accusing others formally of witchcraft, and even from voicing suspicions of witchcraft publicly at all. The Wettringen case is the forerunner of a case-type in which allegations of witchcraft were treated as instances of slander and in which the slanderers rather than the alleged witches came off worst—which played an important part in shaping the council's judicial engagement with witchcraft in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century and remained of some, albeit lesser, significance thereafter.

Keywords:   Wettringen case, Rothenburg council, legal treatment, slander, alleged witches, non-legal methods

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.