Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Globalizing DemocracyPower, Legitimacy and the Interpretation of Democratic Ideas$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Katherine Fierlbeck

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780719049958

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: July 2012

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719049958.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see http://www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 September 2017

Civil society

Civil society

Chapter:
(p.166) 6 Civil society
Source:
Globalizing Democracy
Author(s):

Katherine Fierlbeck

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719049958.003.0007

This chapter investigates the claim that a robust democracy depends upon the ability to ‘strengthen civil society’. It describes how and why civil society has come to be used so widely and with such enthusiastic hope. A number of conceptual objections to the term are also addressed. The concept of civil society is ‘indispensable’ because it promises ‘a theoretical framework that can anchor what is in the end a common discussion across boundaries’. The idea of civil society is unrepentantly grounded within the history of liberal thought. The proponents of ‘civil society’ must be able to reply to three objections: the definition is too ambiguous; causal relationships are circular or misidentified; and falsifiability is impossible. The concept of ‘civil society’ has been overused and overrated, and remains analytically insubstantial. ‘Civil society’ is a shorthand way of expressing the principle of limited government.

Keywords:   civil society, democracy, falsifiability, conceptual objections, limited government, causal relationships, liberal thought

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.