Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Science, race relations and resistanceBritain, 1870-1914$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas A. Lorimer

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780719033575

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719033575.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 December 2018



(p.314) Chapter Eight Conclusion
Science, race relations and resistance

Douglas Lorimer

Manchester University Press

Between 1870 and 1914, ‘race’ remained a contested territory, ambiguous in meaning and subject to dispute. A regressive change occurred under the new imperialism when scientists established their authority as producers of ‘real’ knowledge. In popular science, the common culture had established racial stereotypes long before the 1890s, when state education, mass consumerism and the omnipresence of empire facilitated the dissemination of scientific racism. Unequal and oppressive relationships between peoples and cultures, contrary to the claims of science, were not a product of nature, but a result of human agency. To address this disordered human world, abolitionists and colonial officials invented the language of race relations. Maturing under the new imperialism, the innovations of democratic America, and post-war reconstruction in South Africa, this language strengthened the legitimacy of racial inequality. In response, a dissenting minority initiated a critique of the global pattern of racial oppression. In 1911, the Universal Races Congress met to cultivate racial harmony but could only repeat the century-old pieties of the abolitionists. By then, the abolitionists favoured imperial trusteeship over human rights, and colonial nationalists, marginalised by political failure and war, needed to reconstitute resistance to the imperial state and the hegemonic racism of its culture.

Keywords:   racism, science, knowledge, race relations, humanitarian, trusteeship

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.