Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Science, race relations and resistanceBritain, 1870-1914$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas A. Lorimer

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780719033575

Published to Manchester Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.7228/manchester/9780719033575.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Manchester University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in MSO for personal use (for details see http://www.manchester.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 September 2017

From institutional foundations to applied anthropology, 1871–1914

From institutional foundations to applied anthropology, 1871–1914

Chapter:
(p.59) Chapter Three From institutional foundations to applied anthropology, 1871–1914
Source:
Science, race relations and resistance
Author(s):

Douglas Lorimer

Publisher:
Manchester University Press
DOI:10.7228/manchester/9780719033575.003.0003

‘Race’ has no meaning in biology. Consequently, narratives of racism need to assess how and when scientists established their authority on race, and to explore how imperialism shaped the scientists’ thinking. Francis Galton‘s phrase, ‘nature versus nurture’, best captured the tension between biology and culture in Victorian science. Before the Anthropological Institute, founded in 1871, and in the columns of Nature, ethnography and travel literature rather than comparative anatomy more commonly depicted the racialised peoples of the empire. Knowledgeable about the global distribution of human phenotypes, the scientists largely accepted that humankind had a common origin, and attributed variations to migration, intermixture and adaptation over a lengthy evolutionary history. After the mid-1880s, colonisation in Africa, innovations in statistics, and advances in theories of biological inheritance gave race-thinking a new stimulus. Racism gained credibility with the rise of specialised, professional experts as producers of knowledge in the natural and social sciences. Under the patronage of Galton, eugenics and psychology probed the inherited character of human differences. Anthropology, only recently recognised as a science, studied the exotic cultures of colonised peoples. Its practitioners promoted the utility of their discipline for the administration of a multi-racial empire.

Keywords:   professional science, anthropology, race and culture, nature versus nurture, empire

Manchester Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.